By Filing Buddy . 25 Feb 26

In 2013, Starbucks terminated its packaged coffee distribution agreement with Kraft Foods before the contract term expired. The matter went to arbitration under the agreement’s dispute clause. The arbitrator ruled that Starbucks had breached the contract and ordered it to pay approximately $2.75 billion in damages.
This was not a branding misstep. It was not a market failure. It was a contract structure issue.
Starbucks wanted strategic flexibility. The agreement did not provide it without financial consequence. Termination rights, compensation mechanics, and exit economics were not aligned with business objectives.
The result became one of the most referenced examples in commercial contract law: a vendor agreement can materially impact enterprise value.
As you enter FY 26-27, remember:
Your vendor agreement is not documentation. It is downside protection.
A new financial year should automatically trigger a review of every suppliers contract.

FY 26-27 is particularly critical because:
If your agreement format has not evolved post-pandemic, post-MSME amendments, and in light of emerging data compliance standards, it is outdated.
Vendor contracts should be reviewed with the same seriousness as financial statements. Governance begins at the agreement level.
Termination is not about ending relationships. It is about preserving commercial leverage.
The Starbucks arbitration outcome demonstrates how expensive poorly structured exit rights can become.
A well-drafted vendor agreement must clearly define:
When triggers are vague, disputes shift from performance to interpretation. Clear drafting reduces ambiguity and negotiation friction.
Your suppliers contract should also address what happens after termination:

Exit economics should be predictable. If not, separation becomes financially disruptive.
Between 2017 and 2019, Apple and Qualcomm were engaged in multi-jurisdictional litigation over patent royalty payments linked to iPhone sales. The dispute centred on how royalties were calculated and whether they were excessive relative to chip value.
The disagreement involved billions in contested payments before settlement.
The lesson is simple: Pricing ambiguity escalates into litigation.
Your vendor agreement form must specify:
If the formula requires interpretation, it is insufficient.
For FY 26-27, consider embedding:
Without pricing guardrails, margin erosion happens gradually and often unnoticed.
An SLA (Service Level Agreement) is not decorative language. It operationalises performance expectations.
If deliverables are not measurable, they are not enforceable.
A strong SLA should clearly define:

Link these metrics to a service credit or penalty matrix. Performance must have commercial consequences.
Align payment with performance:
Paying vendors irrespective of output weakens contractual discipline.
India’s MSME framework has materially shifted the allocation of risk.
Section 43B(h) links delayed payments to MSMEs with tax deductibility implications.
Businesses must:
Delayed payments can attract significant statutory interest and affect tax positions. This is no longer merely a vendor relations issue, it is a financial reporting issue.
Your suppliers contract should:
Failing to identify MSME status creates avoidable financial exposure.
The dispute between Amazon and Future Group illustrated how arbitration clauses influence the power of enforcement. Emergency arbitration proceedings and cross-border enforcement became central to the conflict.
The clause determined procedural control.
A robust vendor agreement should clearly specify:
Omissions here often trigger preliminary disputes before substantive issues are even addressed.
Consider structuring:
In commercial disputes, speed determines leverage.
After the 737 MAX crisis, Boeing faced significant financial exposure across suppliers, regulators, and customers. While aviation operates at a different scale, the principle remains universal:
Risk must be contractually allocated.
Your vendor agreement form should include:
Unlimited liability clauses should be evaluated carefully, not accepted reflexively.
Include:
Protection without financial backing offers limited practical value.
The controversy involving Meta demonstrated how third-party data misuse can expose a company to regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage. Vendor ecosystems now extend risk beyond internal teams.

Data governance must be contractual.
Include clauses covering:
Delayed reporting magnifies regulatory and reputational consequences.
Your suppliers contract should:
Data protection cannot rely on assumptions.
The pandemic fundamentally reshaped force majeure interpretation.
Courts globally examined whether lockdowns, supply disruptions, and governmental restrictions triggered contractual relief. Businesses discovered that generic clauses offered limited protection.
Modern force majeure drafting should clearly include:
Precision reduces interpretational disputes.
A commercially balanced clause should also require:
Force majeure should not become a shield for inefficiency.
Even mature businesses make avoidable drafting errors.
Using a generic agreement format without aligning it to business risk results in:
“Template se kaam chal jayega” thinking often proves costly.
Other frequent mistakes include:
A vendor agreement form must reflect commercial strategy, not borrowed language.
Before renewing or executing any suppliers contract, verify:
Make this checklist part of your annual governance framework.
As FY 26-27 begins, vendor agreements should be reviewed strategically, not mechanically.
Three clear takeaways stand out:
A strong vendor agreement does not complicate business. It strengthens it.
As you recalibrate for FY 26-27, ensure your suppliers contract works as hard as your strategy does.
For structured compliance support and agreement review, stay compliant with Filing Buddy.
1. What is a vendor agreement?
A vendor agreement is a legally binding contract that defines commercial terms between a business and its supplier, including pricing, SLA standards, payment terms, liability, termination rights, and dispute-resolution mechanisms.
2. Why should vendor contracts be reviewed annually?
Annual review ensures alignment with tax changes, MSME compliance, pricing volatility, data protection laws, and operational risks. FY-based review prevents outdated clauses from creating financial exposure.
3. What clauses must be included in a suppliers contract?
Key clauses include termination rights, SLA benchmarks, pricing structure, MSME payment terms, indemnity caps, dispute resolution, data protection, audit rights, and force majeure provisions.
4. What is the importance of termination clauses in vendor agreements?
Termination clauses define exit rights, notice periods, compensation mechanisms, and cure timelines. Poorly structured termination language can result in heavy financial penalties.
5. What is an SLA in a vendor agreement?
An SLA (Service Level Agreement) defines measurable performance standards such as turnaround time, quality metrics, uptime thresholds, and penalties for non-performance.
6. How does Section 43B(h) impact vendor payments?
Section 43B(h) links delayed payments to MSMEs with tax deductibility implications. Businesses must ensure timely payment to MSME vendors to avoid interest liability and tax exposure.
7. What is a force majeure clause in a contract?
A force majeure clause excuses performance obligations during unforeseen events like pandemics, government restrictions, or natural disasters, provided the clause is clearly drafted.
8. What are common mistakes in vendor agreement formats?
Common mistakes include copy-paste templates, undefined SLA metrics, unlimited liability acceptance, missing arbitration clauses, and ignoring MSME classification.
9. How should pricing clauses be structured in vendor contracts?
Pricing clauses should clearly define calculation basis, escalation formula, reporting frequency, audit rights, and dispute mechanisms to prevent ambiguity and litigation.
10. What is an indemnity clause in a vendor agreement?
An indemnity clause allocates financial responsibility for losses arising from breach, negligence, IP infringement, or regulatory non-compliance, often subject to liability caps.
11. Why is arbitration important in supplier contracts?
Arbitration clauses determine governing law, seat, procedure, and enforcement speed. A well-drafted clause reduces jurisdictional disputes and ensures faster resolution.
12. What should a vendor agreement form include for data protection?
It should include breach notification timelines, security standards, audit rights, confidentiality obligations, and restrictions on unauthorised sub-processing.
13. How can businesses reduce vendor dependency risk?
Businesses can include minimum supply guarantees, alternate sourcing rights, termination flexibility, and performance-linked obligations within the suppliers contract.
14. When should liability caps be applied in vendor agreements?
Liability caps should generally align with contract value and exclude fraud or wilful misconduct. They balance commercial risk while protecting financial exposure.
15. What is the ideal checklist before signing a vendor agreement?
Verify termination rights, SLA clarity, pricing formula, MSME status, liability caps, indemnity scope, arbitration clause, force majeure definition, and data compliance provisions.
An expert will call you within 24 hours. No payment required to get started.
Understanding Corporate Identification Numbers (CINs) and How to Obtain Them in India
. 2 minsWant to get registered for Udyog Aadhar and Udyam Certificate? Here is their registration processes. Also, know about their differences. Explore their features, benefits, and processes to register online for each, helping you to choose the right option as per your need.
. 3 min readLearn how bank signatory is important for financial workflow. Know why bank signatories are important and discover the documents required to change signature of your signatory.
. 5 min read